Back to All Blog Posts
Civil Procedure6 min read • October 24, 2026

2026–2027 California Civil Procedure Trapdoors: AB 2049 (81-Day MSJ), AB 747 (§ 473.2), and C.C.P. § 2016.040(b)

Three recent statutory overhauls in the Code of Civil Procedure that routinely trip up civil litigators and outdated legal software.

Draft Master Civil Law & Motion Desk • California Civil Procedure Updates
C.C.P. § 437c (AB 2049)C.C.P. §§ 473 & 473.2 (AB 747)C.C.P. § 2016.040(b)CRC Rule 3.1345

1. AB 2049 Summary Judgment Deadlines: 81 / 20 / 11 Days

Effective January 1, 2025 under AB 2049, Code of Civil Procedure § 437c(a)(2) expanded the minimum notice period for a Motion for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication from 75 days to 81 days before the hearing (plus mail or electronic service extensions under § 437c(a)(2) and § 1010.6).

Oppositions are now due at least 20 days before the hearing (up from 14), and Reply briefs are due at least 11 days before the hearing (up from 5), with § 437c(b)(2) & (4) barring massive new evidentiary dumps in reply.

2. Mandatory Court-Reporter Meet & Confer: C.C.P. § 2016.040(b)

Effective January 1, 2026, Code of Civil Procedure § 2016.040(b) requires every civil meet-and-confer declaration to state explicitly whether the parties conferred regarding stipulating to an official or privately retained court reporter (including remote reporting). Omitting paragraph (b) gives opposing counsel an immediate procedural objection on motions to compel.

Remember also that under Golf & Tennis Pro Shop, Inc. v. Superior Court (2022) 84 Cal.App.5th 127, the 45-day jurisdictional clock to compel further responses to interrogatories runs from service of verified responses. Unverified responses or objection-only responses do not trigger the 45-day clock as to unverified factual answers.

Statutory Authority Spotlight: AB 747: Code Civ. Proc. §§ 473 & 473.2 (eff. Jan. 1, 2027)

On January 1, 2027, current C.C.P. § 473 sunsets and is replaced by restructured §§ 473 and 473.2 governing mandatory and discretionary relief from default, default judgment, or dismissal.

3. Don't Forget the Companion Separate Statement (CRC Rule 3.1345)

A Memorandum of Points and Authorities alone is never a complete Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses in California Superior Court. California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1345 mandates a standalone Separate Statement setting forth each discovery request and response verbatim, alongside a Notice of Motion (Rule 3.1112) and Supporting Declaration.

Editorial Notice: Articles published in the Draft Master California Litigation Journal are educational practice guides for licensed attorneys and legal professionals. They do not constitute legal advice or MCLE-accredited instruction, and counsel must verify all authorities in official primary sources prior to filing.
Put This Workflow Into Practice in Draft Master
Remove client details on your computer, check every citation against real legal sources, and export a 28-line pleading in Word.
Draft a Civil Motion Packet
Independent Partner Resource Library • VdVLaw

Companion Reading on Firm AI Policies, SB 574 & Discovery Review

Practical California articles from independent partner VdVLaw on office AI ground rules, client confidentiality, and source-grounded discovery review.

Visit vdvlaw.net/blog

VdVLaw is an independent legal support practice. Draft Master does not own, sell, or support VdVLaw’s services, and neither company certifies the other’s compliance.

More California Litigation Guides